David’s Return and Sheba’s Rebellion in 2 Samuel 19-20
Second Samuel 19-20 records David’s return to Jerusalem after Absalom’s rebellion and the renewed division that follows under Sheba. Although David regains his place as king, the chapters describe continuing grief, disputed loyalties, tribal contention, and bloodshed.
The background includes God’s declaration following David’s sin concerning Bathsheba and Uriah: “the sword shall never depart from thine house” (2 Samuel 12:10). That judgment provides an important setting for these troubles. However, it does not excuse the wrongdoing of Absalom, Sheba, Joab, or anyone else. God’s sovereignty does not remove personal responsibility.
These chapters also record mercy, faithful service, and wise intervention. Their lessons require careful distinctions between what Scripture reports, what it approves, and what it leaves unresolved.
Chapter Summaries
2 Samuel 19: David Returns to His Kingdom
David’s grief overshadows the victory – 2 Samuel 19:1-8
David mourns for Absalom, and the people hear that their king is grieving over his son. Consequently, “the victory that day was turned into mourning unto all the people” (2 Samuel 19:2). The soldiers return quietly, as people ashamed after fleeing from battle.
David’s sorrow as a father is plainly recorded. So is its effect upon those who had defended him. Joab confronts the king, charging that his conduct has shamed the servants who preserved his life and the lives of his household.
Joab’s statement, “thou lovest thine enemies, and hatest thy friends,” is his accusation against David, not an independent declaration by the narrator about everything in David’s heart (2 Samuel 19:6). Nevertheless, the account explicitly shows that David’s mourning has discouraged the people.
Joab urges David to appear publicly and speak comfortably to his servants. David rises and sits in the gate, and the people come before him.
The passage demonstrates the responsibilities that remain upon a leader even during personal sorrow. It does not teach that grief itself is sinful.
Israel discusses restoring David – 2 Samuel 19:9-15
Throughout the tribes of Israel, the people recall David’s deliverance of the nation from its enemies. They acknowledge that Absalom, whom they anointed over them, is dead. They ask, “why speak ye not a word of bringing the king back?” (2 Samuel 19:10).
David sends word through Zadok and Abiathar to the elders of Judah, asking why they should be last to bring him home. He appeals to their relationship with him: “Ye are my brethren, ye are my bones and my flesh” (2 Samuel 19:12).
David also promises Amasa the position of captain of the host in Joab’s place. Amasa had commanded Absalom’s army (2 Samuel 17:25). The appointment may suggest an effort to reconcile former opponents, but Scripture does not explicitly state David’s complete motive.
Judah responds with united support and invites the king to return. David reaches the Jordan, and the men of Judah come to Gilgal to meet him and conduct him across.
Shimei confesses his wrongdoing – 2 Samuel 19:16-23
Shimei, who had cursed David during his flight, comes to meet the returning king. A thousand men of Benjamin accompany him. Ziba also comes with his fifteen sons and twenty servants.
Shimei falls before David and admits, “thy servant doth know that I have sinned” (2 Samuel 19:20). He asks David not to remember his former offense.
Abishai proposes that Shimei should be put to death because he cursed the Lord’s anointed. David refuses to make his restoration a day of execution and assures Shimei, “Thou shalt not die” (2 Samuel 19:23).
The text records Shimei’s confession and David’s oath. It does not disclose enough to establish the full sincerity of Shimei’s heart.
David’s mercy on this occasion should also be distinguished from Shimei’s entire subsequent history. First Kings 2:36-46 records Solomon’s restriction upon Shimei, Shimei’s violation of that restriction, and his eventual execution.
Mephibosheth presents his account – 2 Samuel 19:24-30
Mephibosheth, Saul’s grandson and Jonathan’s son, comes to meet David. Since the king’s departure, he has neither dressed his feet, trimmed his beard, nor washed his clothes.
David asks why he did not accompany him. Mephibosheth explains that he intended to go, but his servant deceived him. He also charges that the servant slandered him before the king.
This directly conflicts with Ziba’s earlier report that Mephibosheth remained in Jerusalem expecting the restoration of Saul’s kingdom (2 Samuel 16:1-4).
Mephibosheth’s neglected appearance is consistent with mourning, but the passage does not record a complete investigation resolving every detail of the opposing accounts. We should not invent one.
David orders that Mephibosheth and Ziba divide the land. Mephibosheth replies:
“Yea, let him take all, forasmuch as my lord the king is come again in peace unto his own house” (2 Samuel 19:30).
His stated willingness to surrender the property emphasizes the importance he places upon David’s safe return. Scripture does not explicitly explain why David chooses this settlement.
Barzillai’s faithful service is acknowledged – 2 Samuel 19:31-40
Barzillai, an eighty-year-old Gileadite from Rogelim, accompanies David to the Jordan. He had supplied the king while David stayed at Mahanaim, and Scripture describes him as “a very great man” (2 Samuel 19:32).
David invites Barzillai to come to Jerusalem and promises to provide for him. Barzillai declines, explaining the limitations of his age and expressing his desire to return home and die near the burial place of his father and mother.
He asks that Chimham go with David instead. David agrees and offers to do whatever Barzillai requests. Before they part, David kisses and blesses him.
Barzillai’s conduct illustrates faithful assistance without an insistence upon personal advancement. His service had already been given when David was away from Jerusalem and needed provisions.
Tribal contention interrupts the restoration – 2 Samuel 19:41-43
The chapter closes with a dispute between Israel and Judah. The men of Israel complain that Judah has taken the leading role in bringing back the king without properly including them.
Judah answers that David is closely related to them and denies receiving material advantage. Israel replies that it has “ten parts in the king” and a greater claim to consideration.
The final statement is sobering: “the words of the men of Judah were fiercer than the words of the men of Israel” (2 Samuel 19:43).
The king has returned, but the dispute exposes continuing division. The account does not commend either side’s contentious spirit.
2 Samuel 20: Sheba’s Rebellion and the Deliverance of a City
Sheba calls Israel away from David – 2 Samuel 20:1-2
Against the setting of tribal contention, Sheba, the son of Bichri, blows a trumpet and declares:
“We have no part in David, neither have we inheritance in the son of Jesse: every man to his tents, O Israel” (2 Samuel 20:1).
Scripture calls Sheba “a man of Belial,” identifying his wicked character. He is a Benjamite.
The men of Israel leave David and follow Sheba, while the men of Judah remain with the king from Jordan to Jerusalem. Sheba’s words reject David’s authority and turn division into open rebellion.
David makes provision for the ten women – 2 Samuel 20:3
Upon returning to Jerusalem, David places the ten concubines who had remained to keep the house under custody and provides for them. He no longer goes in unto them, and they live “in widowhood” until their deaths.
This follows Absalom’s public violation of David’s household in 2 Samuel 16:21-22. The narrative records the women’s continuing circumstances without explaining their personal thoughts or assigning them blame.
The passage is a solemn reminder that the consequences of wrongdoing can fall heavily upon people other than those who initiated it.
Amasa delays, and David sends Abishai – 2 Samuel 20:4-7
David orders Amasa to assemble the men of Judah within three days. Amasa takes longer than the appointed time. Scripture does not explicitly say why.
David warns Abishai that Sheba may do greater harm than Absalom if he reaches fortified cities and escapes pursuit. He therefore directs Abishai to take the king’s servants and pursue him.
Joab’s men, the Cherethites, the Pelethites, and the mighty men go out from Jerusalem. At this point, David’s recorded command is addressed to Abishai.
Joab kills Amasa – 2 Samuel 20:8-13
The pursuing force meets Amasa at the great stone in Gibeon. Joab greets him with apparently friendly words:
“Art thou in health, my brother?” (2 Samuel 20:9).
Joab takes Amasa by the beard as if to kiss him, then strikes him fatally with a sword. Amasa has not guarded himself against the weapon.
Joab and Abishai continue the pursuit. Amasa’s body initially causes the following men to stop. After it is moved from the road and covered, the men proceed after Joab.
The account records a deadly betrayal beneath a friendly greeting. It does not say that David ordered or approved the killing. David later explicitly identifies Joab’s killing of Amasa, together with his killing of Abner, as the shedding of “the blood of war in peace” (1 Kings 2:5).
A wise woman intervenes at Abel – 2 Samuel 20:14-22
Sheba reaches Abel of Beth-maachah. Joab’s forces besiege the city, build a bank against it, and begin attacking the wall.
A woman described as wise calls from the city and requests a conversation with Joab. She speaks of the city’s reputation and says:
“I am one of them that are peaceable and faithful in Israel” (2 Samuel 20:19).
She challenges the destruction of a city belonging to the Lord’s inheritance. Joab answers that he does not intend indiscriminate destruction. His demand concerns Sheba, who has lifted his hand against King David.
The woman goes to the people “in her wisdom” (2 Samuel 20:22). They put Sheba to death and cast his head over the wall. Joab blows the trumpet, the army disperses, and he returns to David at Jerusalem.
The narrative connects the woman’s wise intervention with the ending of the siege. It does not establish a general rule permitting people today to imitate every action taken in this ancient military setting.
The chapter closes with the king’s officers – 2 Samuel 20:23-26
Joab is listed over all the host of Israel. Benaiah is over the Cherethites and Pelethites. Other officials include Adoram, Jehoshaphat, Sheva, Zadok, Abiathar, and Ira.
Joab’s position is a reported fact, not a declaration of God’s approval of his conduct. The presence of an official title does not erase the moral character of the actions already recorded.
Key People and Places
People
- David: Israel’s returning king, grieving for Absalom while resuming the responsibilities of government.
- Joab: The military leader who confronts David, kills Amasa, and directs the siege against Sheba.
- Abishai: Joab’s brother, who proposes Shimei’s execution and receives David’s command to pursue Sheba.
- Amasa: Former commander of Absalom’s army, promised Joab’s position by David, and killed by Joab at Gibeon.
- Shimei: The Benjamite who previously cursed David and now confesses his sin.
- Ziba: Saul’s servant, whose report concerning Mephibosheth is challenged by Mephibosheth.
- Mephibosheth: Jonathan’s son, who explains his absence and expresses joy at David’s peaceful return.
- Barzillai: The elderly Gileadite who supplied David at Mahanaim.
- Chimham: The man Barzillai asks David to receive in his place.
- Sheba: The son of Bichri, a Benjamite who leads another rebellion against David.
- The wise woman of Abel: The unnamed woman who negotiates with Joab and speaks to her city.
- Zadok and Abiathar: Priests through whom David communicates with Judah’s elders.
- Benaiah: The officer over the Cherethites and Pelethites.
Places
- Mahanaim: The place where Barzillai supplied David during his displacement from Jerusalem.
- Jordan: The river David crosses on his return.
- Gilgal: The place to which Judah comes to meet the king.
- Jerusalem: David’s royal city and the destination of his return.
- Judah: The tribe that conducts David back and remains with him during Sheba’s rebellion.
- Gibeon: The location of the great stone near which Joab kills Amasa.
- Rogelim: Barzillai’s home.
- Abel of Beth-maachah: The city besieged because Sheba has taken refuge there.
Main Doctrinal or Spiritual Themes
Sin’s Consequences Can Continue Beyond Forgiveness
David had received the assurance, “The LORD also hath put away thy sin” (2 Samuel 12:13). Nevertheless, the same passage announced serious consequences.
Forgiveness must not be confused with the removal of every earthly consequence. These chapters belong to the continuing account of trouble in David’s household and kingdom. They do not teach salvation by works or that suffering earns forgiveness.
Authority Carries Moral Responsibility
David must attend to his people despite his grief. Military leaders must also answer for how they exercise power.
Joab’s effectiveness does not justify his killing of Amasa. Scripture must judge the methods as well as the results. Success, influence, and position cannot make wrongdoing righteous.
Mercy and Justice Must Be Distinguished Carefully
David shows mercy to Shimei, while Joab’s violence against Amasa receives explicit condemnation in David’s later instructions.
The chapters require us to distinguish confession from proven inward repentance, mercy from approval of sin, and recorded conduct from commanded conduct. We must not claim knowledge of hearts that Scripture does not reveal.
Wisdom Can Preserve Life
The wise woman’s conversation with Joab identifies the specific cause of the siege and opens a way for it to end.
Her actions illustrate the value of timely, careful speech. The principle agrees with Proverbs 15:1: “A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger.”
Faithful Service Matters
Barzillai’s provision for David is remembered and acknowledged. His age does not make his earlier service insignificant.
The account encourages believers to value practical faithfulness. Food, assistance, hospitality, and other ordinary acts of service can meet real needs without attracting public attention.
Practical Applications or Lessons
- Bring your grief to God while attending to your responsibilities. David’s sorrow was real, but his people still needed him. Believers can acknowledge suffering honestly while seeking God’s help to fulfill necessary duties.
- Receive needed correction without assuming the messenger is flawless. David acted upon Joab’s counsel concerning the people. Joab’s later wrongdoing does not remove the need to examine a particular correction honestly.
- Listen before reaching conclusions. The conflicting accounts of Ziba and Mephibosheth caution against confidence based upon one person’s accusation. Proverbs 18:17 says, “He that is first in his own cause seemeth just; but his neighbour cometh and searcheth him.”
- Do not let loyalty become an excuse for pride or contention. Judah and Israel argued over their claims upon David. Christians should guard against turning legitimate responsibilities or relationships into occasions for rivalry.
- Judge conduct by Scripture, not by usefulness. Joab served important military purposes, but his treatment of Amasa was still wrong. Ability does not excuse dishonesty, cruelty, or betrayal.
- Serve faithfully without demanding prominence. Barzillai helped David when provision was needed. Believers should be willing to meet needs even when service brings no title or public recognition.
- Use words to clarify and resolve conflict. The wise woman asked questions and addressed the actual issue. Careful speech can prevent an already serious conflict from causing greater harm.
- Respect the limits of the biblical account. Scripture does not explain Amasa’s delay, settle every detail of the dispute concerning Mephibosheth, or disclose every motive behind David’s decisions. Faithful Bible study leaves those limits intact.

Comments are closed